Monday, April 7, 2008

Michael Steele Will Choose Barack Obama If You'll Stop the Bitching

Snob fact: For Senate Michael Steele was endorsed by Mike Tyson and Don King. Tyson is the ex-husband of Steele's sister.


All this week, and all the next,
The Black Snob is taking a look at the views of black conservatives on Barack Obama. We’re examining who likes him, who doesn’t. Who will vote for him and who won’t. So far we’ve looked at the views of Amy Holmes, Condoleezza Rice, Alan Keyes, Colin Powell, Armstrong Williams and more.

Republican Michael Steele was at one point the highest ranking black official in the United States as Lieutenant Governor of Maryland. That was before Deval Patrick was elected governor of Massachusetts and before David Paterson was upgraded to governor of New York after hooker-gate.

He was the, pardon my parlance, the HNIC, “Head Negro in Charge.”*

But if he truly was the HNIC, he was a figure-head, only holding sway in his state and among other Republicans. Most blacks outside of Maryland didn’t know who he was and disregarded him the minute they learned that he was that dreaded anathema, a black conservative.

Coming from a Democratic household only to later convert to Republicanism in his youth, Steele was aware of his “odd man out” status among the majority of political minded African Americans.

There was the phantomOreo cookie” incident, where Steele famously claimed that a plague of locust-like, black and white snack treats rained down at his feet at a 2002 gubernatorial race debate in Maryland, moderated by the Balitmore NAACP.

“Maybe it was just someone having their snack, but it was there,” Steele said after the debate. “If it happened, shame on them if they are that immature and that threatened by me.”

Steele claimed opponent Kathleen Kennedy Townsend’s campaign handed out cookies to the audience beforehand, but other than Steele and his communications manager, no one could corroborate that the incident actually took place.

Steele rose quickly as a star in the party after his stint as lieutenant governor in a largely Democratic state. He spoke at the 2004 Republican Convention, giving the counterpoint speech to Barack Obama’s as the Democratic Convention. He was persuaded to run for senate in Maryland. Despite having a clever “I’m not a puppy hater” commercial, was throttled by his Democratic opponent, Benjamin L. Cardin, 55-to-44 percent.

This doesn't look misleading at all. See? It's Steel Democrats! Get it?

Steele’s loss could also be attributed to some financial shenanigans with the party and a shady flier that gave the impression he was a Democrat and was endorsed by other prominent black Democrats, none of which were true. As seen in the photo above, this was not misleading at all. It says Steele Democrats on it. Of course, they could have put "Steal Democrats" on it and it would have been more apropos. But honest mistake, I'm sure.

Steele also tried with some success (and some failure) at appealing to the black community to give the other side a shake.

“There was this wall, this separation, this question of my blackness and where I stood on issues and what it all meant and I would start every conversation with what do you see,” Steele said at the State of the Black Union earlier this year.

Steele argued that he was still a black man who’d lived through similar experiences as other blacks and that black people must recognize that blacks do have a diversity of thought. He mentioned the works of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and others, saying “We’re the generation that is a great beneficiary of the work of Dr. King and many others who got us to the lunch counter,” Steele said. “Now we have to realize we have to take ownership of the diner.”

Half-jokingly/half-serious, Steele encouraged the audience to vote Republican in the fall.

Steele is anti-abortion, anti-embryonic stem cell research, pro-tax cuts and pro-death penalty. But Steele is not a hardliner on other core conservative issues, speaking about inequities in blacks receiving the death plenty more often than whites. Streele is also surprisingly for Affirmative Action, the usual scourge of black Republicans. He sees it as a necessity considering the glaring gaps in education, income and employment between blacks and whites.

Steele is presently working for the Republican National Committee, but doesn’t rule out a return to office. He’s made the pundit circuit talking about Obama’s candidacy and while he doesn’t give a lot of specifics in his true feelings for the Great Black Hopemongerer, Steele calls Obama’s ascension a proud moment for all black Americans.

At the State of the Black Union, Steele exclaimed his pride over a Barack Obama candidacy.

“I’m very proud of Barack Obama to do what he has done and proud of what he’s doing,” he said, adding that while he is the “polar opposite” to Obama’s, “We can all be proud at an African American Republican achieving such success.”

Steele made some similar statements in an interview with Marc Fisher, reported on Fisher’s blog “Raw Fisher” on the Washington Post Web site.


“What’s kicked in is this sense of pride,” says Michael Steele, the Prince George’s Republican who lost a race for U.S. Senate two years ago. “Initially, all the talk was ‘we don’t know him or what he stands for,’ but after the Clintons did their show in South Carolina, it kind of moved black people beyond any sense of allegiance to the Clintons. Now you have a Shakespearean melodrama being played out between Lady Macbeth and Hamlet.”


Steele, who grew up a Democrat in Washington, says he has watched his friends in politics--many of whom are black Democrats--fall for Obama in a big way. “This whole Camelot thing, falling in love with the idea of a black president--putting him in this bubble does all of us a disservice. In fact, he’s extremely talented. But you need to apply the same standards you would to anyone else.”


Steele appears to have warmer feelings for Obama than some other black conservatives, like Obama’s former opponent Alan Keyes, who takes Obama-hate to new, psychotic levels. But he’s a bit of a toss up for the ultimate test for Obamaitis.


Chances of Endorsing Obama: Not if he wants to keep working for the Republican Party. No matter how Steele really feels he’s made a life for himself as a Republican and is in a good position with the party that could lead to work in future presidential administration or a possible VP ticket in the future. He’s not going to rock the boat.


Chances of Voting for Obama: I think not, considering Steele is anti-abortion and that can be a deal breaker. Steele actually considered the priesthood, so he likely takes his pro-fetus stance seriously. (Although Steele doesn’t appear to support a constitutional ban on abortion.)



-----

*Correction, Steele's claim of HNIC-ness has been challenged by DailyKos reader Bendygirl. The Maryland State Archives site says he was. But the Ohio Chamber of Commerce site says "Hell. To. The. No." Jeanette Bradley was the lieutenant boss with the sauce."

41 comments:

Anonymous said...

i know in america, we can be who ever we want to be, but i can't wrap my head around "black republican"...it doesn't roll off my tongue easily...

*starrie*

Danielle said...

I think there wouldn't be so much hostility towards Black Republican's if some folks didn't feel the the party despises us for being black.

I think folks are genuinely puzzled at how black folk could represent for a party that seems to have no respect for our concerns.

Strange days indeed. This an excellent series snob.

The Uppity Negro said...

This was sooooo funny, because its soooooo true. Never heard of Michael Steele until the State of the Black Union in February. And my friend rattled off all this information about him, about him being Lt. Gov. in Maryland and I was really trying to figure out why I hadnt heard of him.

Then two things came to my remembrance. 1) He's IS the anathema: the dreaded black Conservative. Beware and lock your doors because they do exist. And 2) this was the home state of Alan Keys, I'm sure Alan's bug-eyed rants kept Steele very much in the background of black Conservatives.

Listening to him at the SOTBU I had an appreciation for him, but again, on FoxNews, your credibility is shot for me. I'll never understand black intelligensia, be they Republican or Democrat subjecting themselves to the rants of Sean Hannity or Bill O'Reilly.

Anonymous said...

yes...i am one of those who is puzzled by black people who choose to be part of the party that shamelessly ignores our concerns and drag up negativity about us to further their cause...

foxnews is evil...for crying out loud, bill o'reilly used to shill for "a current affair"... and sean hannity...ugh...but these two clowns seem to draw a loyal crowd...can't understand it...

just like i would be driving a see a beat up car in front of me with a "bush/chaney" bumper sticker...my blood would just boil...

*starrie*

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]But if he truly was the HNIC, he was a figure-head, only holding sway in his state and among other Republicans. Most blacks outside of Maryland didn’t know who he was and disregarded him the minute they learned that he was that dreaded anathema, a black conservative.[/quote]

(Personal Note: Bite your tongue, stay focused. This is not about challenging anyone. This is about getting them to see the portion of their notions that don't make sense)

As we go forward into the year of our Lord, 2008 - the reports say that there are roughly 10,000 Black Elected Officials across America. (This figure jumps to 16,000 if you go further down in various organizations and include those who are appointed having been confirmed rather than elected).

As I attempt to reconsile the fact that today in 2008, WE HAVE MORE PEOPLE OF OUR OWN CHOOSING IN POWER OVER OUR OWN COMMUNITIES - where we have the CHOICE to put into place anyone we choose.......there are some things that I just don't understand.

Despite the presence of these POPULAR figures, put there by POPULAR VOTE from the Black community......many of the same issues that were present when a more adversarial figure was in place presiding over our communities.

With this fact in mind - I am lead to believe that there are two main concepts that must be introduced to the debate regarding the so called "Black Best Interests"

1) Those methods that are POPULARLY THOUGHT TO BE in the "Best Interests Of Black people" and thus anyone who is opposed to these policies enjoy the wrath of the POPULAR agents of Black political activism

2) Those methods that are MEASURABLY and IN-FACT "The Best Interests of The Black Community" as it can be PROBABLY shown that in following these initiatives BLACK FOLKS have moved closer to our collective goals.

With that said - I must note that too many of our people mistake what is POPULAR among the masses of Black folks as being our "Best Interests", mostly because it is in alignment with the common thoughts and biases that are contained within our group.

Rarely do these ASSUMPTIONS get road tested. As more political power is obtained via the people who advance this ideology and method it would SEEM TO BE THE CASE that those who are interested in BLACK ADVANCEMENT closer toward OUR COMMON OBJECTIVES, and not JUST the acquisition of POWER would take a step back and take such measure.

For example - with the POPULAR political machine firmly in control in various cities one would think that in having control over the public education system either via the school board, the mayors office/city council and in many cases BOTH would also translate into improvement in this vital area for our people. If you assumed that this would be the case - you would be dead wrong in many instances across the nation.

Thus - coming back to MICHAEL STEELE'S affilation being the key problem with him and grounds for rejection of his ideas - it is clear that this is yet another instance of POPULARITY trumping any notions of EFFECTIVENESS. Before Mr. Steele even opens his mouth that (R) after his name is enough to tell the Black observer all that he needs to hear from Mr. Steele. The fact is that a REPUBLICAN CAN'T WIN DOG CATCHER in a majority Black district.

If we are contented with POPULARLITY alone then this would stand. Mr. Steele should just move on, not waste his time or money because "We Black folks ain't buy'in nothing".


BUT WAIT. Why isn't the counter question and argument ever entertained? Why is there seeming carte blanc with regard to the Black guy with the (D) after his name? With so many of them IN POWER VIA OUR OWN CHOOSING - our communities where they are dominant SHOULD BE ROLL'IN right now.

Instead what we have is a condition where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS NEVER HAD MORE POWER WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY, there has never been more people of our own choosing (Black or White) over our communities and yet STILL the misery and grievance indexes are at record highs.

The question must be asked again - Who are you WORKING to benefit in all that you do? (YOU = generic 'you')

Shouldn't you have more to show from your 90% loyalty?

Instead of being marketed to regarding WHY you should vote a certain way your vote is so 'in the bag' that now it is a matter of gettin you TRANSPORTATION to the polls so that you can do as the ultimate beneficiary KNOWS what you are going to do. (And you have WHAT to show for it again?)

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]But if he truly was the HNIC, he was a figure-head, only holding sway in his state and among other Republicans. Most blacks outside of Maryland didn’t know who he was and disregarded him the minute they learned that he was that dreaded anathema, a black conservative.[/quote]

danielle:

How do you reconsile your OPINIONS with THE FACTS?

If the one guy is IGNORING your concerns....but the other guy is IN POWER OVER YOUR COMMUNITY and has it on lockdown?

What is the photographic negative of the "guy who doesn't care about your INTERESTS" and thus he leaves you all alone to fend for yourself?

For me it becomes a "CSI moment" in which you 'inspect the finger prints on the steering wheel and the gear shifter' and make not that THESE ARE NOT HIS!!!

As Black people we let it be known - WE DON'T LIKE NO STINKIN REPUBLICANS!!! After we ran them out and their 'good ole boy network' with them........WHO ASSUMED POWER in our communities?

Better yet, Danielle - now that these forces are IN POWER over our communities when it is that we transition from the mode of "Republican/Conservative Eradication" over to the notion of "We gave you the POWER over us, not because we HATED THE OTHER GUY but BECAUSE WE BELIEVED THAT YOU HAVE OUR BEST INTERESTS IN MIND.....we now need for you to EXPRESS and EXPOSE 'our best interests'!!!"

Do you see how it works Danielle? For most people there would be an "OR" after that quote above - "Express our best interests OR we'll START SHOPPING ONCE AGAIN!".

Unfortunately this is not the case for those who don't have their own BEST INTERESTS in mind but instead who "Hate their enemies more than they love themselves". The fact that THEIR ENEMIES have no power over their local communities where they have the final say is just fine with them. This is all that they are asking for.

What is your "or else" Danielle, others?

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]yes...i am one of those who is puzzled by black people who choose to be part of the party that shamelessly ignores our concerns and drag up negativity about us to further their cause...
[/quote]

Starie:

I agree with you. Anyone who uses NEGATIVELY about Black people to advance their own agenda is shameless indeed, and they don't deserve our support.

Unfortunately you seemingly only consider one end of the spectrum. There is an entire (and I would argue LARGER) other side of this concept that uses Black afflictions to further their cause. More disturbingly, however, is that they USE us and have our POPULAR SENTIMENT in the process.

If Fox News is evil as it attempts to stereotype Black people then I can only imagine what you think about the various left-leaning media outlets that are most confortable with us when we "assume the position":

Victims, empoverished, ignorant, and too feeble to fend for ourselves absent their help.

Starie: If Fox News parades various "Black Conservatives" in front of the camera and thus embarrases oru race what do you say about the ACLU and other left organizations? Did you read about the case in Palm Beach County FL in which the photographic negative to Sean Hannity - the snarling White Liberal - provided HELP to the Black folks who are failing the high school there, saying that THE HIGH SCHOOL is responsible for the fact that only 55% of Blacks had graduated versus 80% of Whites? Do you believe that the "Anti-Sean Hannity" is all altruistic in his ways, no hint of racial supremacy crossing his mind?

If the Black Conservative is at most 8% of the Black populace - what does his photographic negative on the opposite end of the spectrum represent?

I still don't understand the disproportionate focus on the "shady character" known as the Black Conservative". He HAS NO POWER NOR CREDIBILITY WITHIN the group known as the Black Community. If a person is really interested in finding out "what ailes him" he would not go to the drug label on his prescription and focus on the INERT INGREDIENTS as they are IRRELEVANT in his CURE....he would instead focus on the ACTIVE INGREDIENTS and the impact that they have on his body....this is the OVERDOSE that could KILL HIM. (Please note - this is NOT directed at the BLOG ADMINISTRATOR but instead is a GENERAL statement)

Adam said...

I'm a Black Republican. There are definitely some Republicans that are racist but most aren't. There are also some racist Democrats. Racism is not limited to one party. In case you don't know, Martin Luther King was a Black Republican.

What I find interesting about the Democratic party and the Black community is that 95% of us support this party despite their racist history. They have done some good things but if you look into the histories of both parties over the last 150 years, the Democrats have done far, far more to keep the black community down then Republicans. Yet, nearly everyone always votes Democratic. What party worked to pass Jim Crow laws in the South? The Democrats. What party wanted to keep black people in chains as slaves? The Democrats. After the Civil War, who fought Republican backed civil rights legislation for nearly 100 years? Democrats. If you don't believe me, check your history books.

The Black community doesn't need more welfare. We don't need more handouts. We don't need more government programs. We need school choice, something which Democrats have fought for years. We need to make sure our children are staying in school and going to college. We need to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps. Racism exists but it can be overcome and success is possible with hard work and persistence. If the solution to all of the problems we face was simply voting Democratic, why, after over 40 years of voting Democratic, is the literacy rate in our community lower than it was a hundred years ago when racism was far worse than it is today? Thinking that one political party or the other is going to come in and transform our community obviously hasn't worked. Education, hard work and persistence always work.

Anonymous said...

I'm a middle class white Republican female from the Midwest (Indpls, Cinci, Detroit, greater Chicago), lived in the northeast (New York), in Texas (Dallas), and now living in the south (small town ARK); I have friends in both parties all over the country (in the places we've lived).

If you mean the LEADERS for the Republican party despise you for being black, I would contest that, but I can't give any PERSONAL testimony about it. I look at Republican policies though, and I believe, IMHO, they are actually better for blacks than what the Dems offer, as has been pointed out in previous comments. I lived in Detroit and black Dems in power really did nothing for the black community--this was also pointed out in previous comments.

However, if you think the average member of the Republican party (i.e., not the leaders/elected officials) despise blacks, you would be wrong, at least in my experience. I know it's purely anecdotal, but of the hundreds of Repubs I know, only a VERY small minority would I saw aren't comfortable around blacks CERTAIN blacks (the ones that talk a certain way, for example). And I would not say they DESPISE them, just aren't comfortable around them or may avoid them. In my perhaps limited experience, most of my Repub friends have black friends, are married to blacks, adopt black or biracial children (a whole other issue, I know), their kids attend schools with (sometimes many--up to 80%) black students and have black teachers, join groups with black members (such as home school support groups), and attend church with black members. Many of my friends are pro-voucher and anti-teacher union because we feel the public school system is failing the poorer of the black communities and these changes would help.

As someone commented earlier, both parties have racists. I just get tired of the Repubs being labelled as the racist party all the time, when I just don't see it. I don't believe their policies are racist and I don't believe the members of the Repub party in general are racist. At least, not in my experience.

McMurdo

Anonymous said...

I agree with Adam the black republican and McMurdo. From my experience as a former democrat now republican from NYC, who happens to be white I have seen more racism exhibited by people who I know who are democrats than I have from my friends who are republicans. In many cases, democrats, my family included who are staunch democrats and see me as blacks see Mr. Steele as a black republican, as someone who is betraying their community-- feel a collective guilt for slavery and the immoral systemic racism of our country's past. They frequently think of African-Americans as incapable, or hopelessly incapacitated by because of this past and refuse to acknowledge the strides we have made to move forward as a society. Certainly, we should keep this in mind, but there's one thing to keep in mind the injustices previous generations have suffered and the idea that because of that leveling the playing field by affirmative action assumes some importance but to assume blacks as incapable is an outrage and a general concept espoused by the democrats. I can't understand why there aren't more African Americans who recognize this and continue their knee jerk reactions to black republicans and republicans in general--they demonize republicans and profess us as espousing racism. It's almost as if there is something blocking their ears not allowing them to hear the message which is a good one for all people:Republicans generally believe that anyone can succeed in this country given hard work and perseverance and in that they accept blacks to be just as capable of whites. Where is the racism in this? Fundamentally, republicans believe success is up to the individual, the sheer determination, the will, the human spirit which when tapped into illustrates and serves to bring forth everyone's potential, everyone's capacity. Pandering to helplessness is a gross injustice--it denies people the chance and doesn't give them the opportunity to reach within themselves for the strength to succeed. This might sound like bizarre, like an alien concept (to democrats) but it happens to be the very concept that made this country great and what the rest of the world lacks--the concept of "yes we ca" to coin a phrase from our new president. I just disagree on who the"WE" is--I believe that that we is me, that that we is you and NOT the government because the government can't give you what you can find and seek from within--the human drive and spirit. The best way to illustrate what I am saying is this--to coin the words of another black leader. Al Sharpton who once said "You've got to demand self respect" So if you see a black republican and wonder how he can betray his people, how he can espouse a cause that is not in his best interest or his community's just remember that he has by his sheer will and determination has succeeded and understands the magic ingredient--it's not hand outs!! that you can not give away, you can not get from the government, that is the one thing that is attainable ONLY by the individual themselves. By the way, if you look at cities like Detroit or Newark...etc, you see governments, democratic, predominantly black time and again betray their constituents--isn't it time for all of us to be asking why? Maybe, just maybe it's the message. Maybe, just the republican party has the answer. Let's join forces, shall we?

Anonymous said...

First-Republicans freed the slaves, fought a war for it to be precise. A republican president fought for the freedom of slaves.

I am amazed that you would suggest Michael was not black because he has conservative values. I guess if you don't think as the majority of disinfranchised democrats than you are not black. You can't have it both ways free thinking people of any color and forced thinking to surpress their ideas.

tony said...

you people r so funny. u need to read my blog at youngblackrepublicans.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...

Way to be open-minded people. Wow, a black republican how novel? give me a break...

Anonymous said...

Interesting comments from both sides of the issue. Question, are the interests of the black man or woman served better by the Democrat or Republican Parties? In all reality and truthfulness, the Republican Party wins hands down. Why? Because the Democratic Party both uses and abuses, as well as takes for granted their support. Sometime ago(2004), I wrote an article stating that the black American needed to get off the plantation, that plantation being the Democratic Party. That observation and proposition is still a valid and most vital point
today,
The Democratic Party is there with a hand out, and what is being offered is both destructive counter productive, whether it be the welfare system or the public school.
Putting aside the welfare system, which poisons and imprisons the recipients, take a brief look at the public school.
The public school is a complete failure, particularly in the inner city. No amount of money poured into the system will help, because the system itself is askew. Failure to teach the three R's and instead concentrate on multiculturalism and the further lack of discipline has made the public school system a disaster. Yet, the Democrats, along with the National Education Association, refuse to consider, let alone implement, school choice, a proven successful alternative. The Republicans believe in a hand up, not a hand out, and there are plenty of spaces that are waiting to be filled by God-fearing, family value opiented, black American men and women. Let me further say that, a man like Michael Steele, would be more sympathetic and energetic towards meeting the needs of Black America as well as white America than Barack Obama. Why? Because Mr. Steele's philososophy and character is much more akin to the values of traditional America. Unfortunately, and I pray that I am wrong, we may find this much sooner to be true shortly after Mr. Obama assumes the Presidency.
You see, black America is more inately family value oriented than white America, and more particularly so than the Democretic Party, which champions
abortion and homosexuality with it's abhorrent claim to the sanctity of marriage. It will be a cold day in Hell before the God of the heavens sanctions that sacrament ignominiously bestowed by reprobate members of the judiciary.
In closing, indeed there is much room for improvement in the Republican Party, both in it's failure to adequately articulate it's values and speak with unwavering clarity on the issues, as well as formally or informally invite the membership and participation more black men and women of America. Michael Steele
is the man of today who can accomplish the above objectives with vitality and conviction, and he has my undivided support in obtaining the position of head of the Republican National Committee as I truely feel he is the most capable and most qualified to fulfill that most important position. The very future of our nation and it's people hang in the balance.
Attorney Ken Shaw
145 Niles-Cortland Rd. NE
Warren, Ohio 44484
Ph. 330-856-2922
Shawlaw2000@aol.com

Hanna said...

I am seeing all this talk about white vs black etc. and I don't understand it. I have never, nor has anyone I have ever known made judgements based on skin color. We do however make judgements based on behavior. But that is an individual thing, not a group thing.

There can be one or hundreds of individuals engaging in a certain behavior, but that does not make an entire group of people guilty be they white or black.

My husband and I worked, we sent our children to public school, we made them do their homework even when they didn't want to, we kept track of where they were and what they were doing all day and night, every day and night. They graduated, they earned scholorships and got student loans and put themselves through school, then went on to whatever career they chose. Every individual in this country has the same opportunity available to them.

The purpose of government is to do for the people collectively what they cannot do for themselves as well individually.

The federal government should only be involved in things that are national concerns. Militairy, interstate highways, etc.

State government to address things that involve the entire state, and local government to be concerned with local communities etc.

It is unfortunate that we can't paint everyone purple so we can get off this tired horse and perhaps finally get something worthwhile done.

Anonymous said...

MLK was a black Republican. It was a Republican president that freed the slaves. Sen. Al Gore Sr. (D-Tenn) voted against the Voting Rights of 1964. Sen. Robert Bird (D-W.Virginia) was in the KKK, btw he's still in the Senate. It was a Republican that made Colin Powell a 4 star general, it was a Republican that made him Sec. of State. He thanks them by supporting the most liberal person in Congress. A person (Obama) who voted in the US Senate against the surge in Iraq and a person who refused to support the born alive infant protection act in the Ill. State Senate.

The Democrats have done more to hurt black people than they've ever done to help. Keeping lower income blacks and whites on welfare for generations in order to secure their votes. Now they're doing the same thing to Hispanics. Democrats support abortion. Most women who have abortions are also lower income people. Can't have too many brown kids around, might take their power away. I agree with the poster who said our public school system is a failure. The Democrats in my local government's only solution is to poor more money into the schools instead of addressing the problem. I have a friend who was a public school teacher. She said she couldn't teach the children because she was too busy disciplining them.

The Democrats look at blacks as well as other minorities as useful puppets to get what they need. Just like the communist do their people in N. Korea, Cuba, etc., keep 'em ignorant and dependent on government handouts.

Anonymous said...

It is naive to think we have the same opportunites in America. That being said I do think we should all work hard no matter who we are. For those of you talking about the history of slavery and political affiliations read your history. In 1948 the Republican party no longer wanted freedom for slaves. No party has a monopoly on treating people equally. Racism is alive and well but so is my Savior, Jesus Christ. I trust Him not a political party. God Bless you guys.

Anonymous said...

For the person who said the Republican Party is better for blacks, the Republican Party is beloved by the KKK my friend. I agree with the other post. No political party has a monopoly on equality and fairness. They are all corrupt

Anonymous said...

If people would actually read their history, they would discover that the party that really doesn't look out for you is the Democratic Party. Did you know that most of the racist throughout our American history have been democrats. George Wallace was one of the biggest racists in history and he was a card-carrying democrat. Even your beloved JFK kept a constant surveillance on MLK, even after MLK endorsed him. That is also where the shift in mindset began. Please read the Clarence Mason Weaver book, " It's OK to Leave the Plantation" because many black folk are still living there.

Anonymous said...

Let’s step back for a second to be fair. First, because of the media biased, Republican are always portrayed as racist of some sort. And when the Republican party does anything positive for minorities, it is seen as a smoke screen. So when is it ever right, for all those who cast blame on the Republican Party? Republicans in almost all circumstances, have been the first party to elected anyone of color, or appoint them to a high office. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican, and at the time of Kings highest achievements, the only known X-member of the KKK, currently serving in the Senate, Democrat Byrd, called King a trouble maker, and a communist. Pres. Kennedy(D), authorized Dr.Kings phones to be wired taped during the civil rights movement. And we do remember it was the majority of the Democrats that voted for segregation, all we have to do is look at voting records, which are public. And everyone remembers Gov. Wallace (D) I hope, who activated the National Guard and stood in front of the school denying the first black student to enter. PLEASE don’t be fooled by the liberal media, don’t rely on this as your only way to gain knowledge of history. Maryland is primary democratic, well tell me why Steele(R) was the first African American elected to high office there. By all means both parties were a disgrace during the Civil Rights era, and slavery, however the Republican Party pulled ahead for the better of the country. All I am saying is don’t let the media bias use you, so there beloved party will always be elected. Do research so u can come up with a honest statement. If congress leaves Obama alone, he will make a great President, lets hope they don’t make him there puppet. This is a great website for African Americans struggling with being black and being a Republican.
http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.DYK-Katrina&tp_preview=true

Anonymous said...

First, let me say that I am a white Republican male. There, now that I got that off my chest, I'd like to offer some hope.

I believe very strongly in conservative ideals. And I mean the noble conservative ideals - pro-life, self-reliance, faith in God, each other, and ourselves. But I will be the first to admit that the Republican party has not been terribly friendly to blacks in this country the past couple of decades. I have a lot of Republican friends. When we sit at the lunch table, some of them can be very dismissive of black people or even flat out rude, and it iritates me. It irritates me that the Republican party marginalized Alan Keyes. Even if he wasn't the great black hope for conservatives that some of us made him out to be, it was still quite unsettling to see him blocked from participating in debates.

I am part of a growing group of white American conservatives that is sick and tired of a Republican party that ignores black people. I want to see the black community finally throw off the shackles of slavery once and for all, and it won't happen until...and hear me out on this...UNTIL the black community becomes as truly diverse in political beliefs as white people. The fact is, black people are still individuals with different styles, tastes, dreams, etc. I recognize that you share some things in common that white people just don't get. No matter how empathetic I may try to be, I will never really understand what it means to be black, and I admit that.

But I know in my heart that a visible indicator that black Americans are making advancements into American culture is political diversity. When blacks begin to rise up and say "Enough!" to Democrats, then the dreams of MLK are finally being realized.

I'm sick of both parties trying to USE blacks to further their causes. At times, I hoped beyond hope that Bush Jr. or McCain would choose Colin Powell as a running mate, because I knew it would be good for the Republican party. But that is just another form of using someone.

What I hope now is that the black community will start asking itself the hard questions about what is really in their best interests. Ultimately, I hope you come to the realization that it's okay to disagree on that. It's okay for Michael Steele to exist. He's not really the anathema. Nor is he the entire solution.

Black people can't trust white people to solve their problems. The best you can hope from us is that we will open our eyes and hearts and be receptive to common sense changes that need to be made. I used to dislike affirmative action, because it was in opposition to the Republican agenda. Now, I'm not so sure. I'm sure there is room for some common ground. And if principled people like Michael Steele can both support affirmative action while opposing abortion, maybe I should listen to him.

I didn't vote for President Obama, but I am still happy that he represents yet another step in the right direction for black Americans. But I hope that it doesn't end here. I hope that he is just the beginning, and that people like Mr. Steele find....no TAKE...their rightful seat in American politics. Black people deserve to feel ownership in this country. After all, they have been here as long as white people, even if it was against their will. Everything good that has happened in this country has happened with the help of black people, and it's far past time that black Americans felt a sense of equal ownership in it. And I do not believe for a second that strong moral values and principled ethics must be sacrificed to achieve that either.

God bless.

Anonymous said...

Ok I can assure you that the last poster, the one claiming to be a Republican, but then saying how bad they have been to the black community, I can rest assure that it is again, another liberal media source that planted that entire comment. Otherwise he would at least know a little about history and include that in his rambling. The only thing that did make sense is that African Americans, should stand up for themselves, and not stand behind Democrats, who use them for there silly game.....

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry but which one of you "African-Americans" are actually from Africa? I was born in Florida. Does that make me a Florida-American? I now live in Atlanta. Am I now an Atlanta-American?

For a group of people so concerned about getting respect, your focus is too much on the past instead of the future. This PC BS has to end!!

Obama is president and white guilt is dead!

jess sayin said...

Snobgrrl, you hit a nerve with the resnublicans! We're gonna keep this blog going for a year! Hey, lets face it. The party thing's not a black-white thing. We don't hate republicans but we fear them because they are they are fascist idiots and hypocrites. Even in these comments, they're throwing their Bibles around like Israelis drop bombs on refugee camps. And then y'all turn around and tell us that YOU are the victims here. For all that jaw jacking about morals, it'd be nice if y'all could show us how that's supposed to work. Beating up teenage girls and murdering doctors is supposed to do what for your souls? It's one thing to be a Democrat and have some sick people in your party. It's another thing to make being a sociopath your party's manifesto. Worst of all, they want to get rid of the Constitution, all it's checks and balances and the Bill of Rights so they can enjoy a blatant totalitarian dictatorship. Being arrogant and self worshiping, they think their shiz don't stink and each one thinks he'll be the next Hitler, not the greedy power hungry jerk whose ass he just licked.


Anyway, what I really wanted to say is that CHANGE is here, and that change has a name: Barrak Obama. He's bringing us earthlings together, instead of bashing people. Unlike Mr. Steele who says he's "ready to spar." What kind of talk is that? Sounds like Uncle Tommin' to me.

fightthemainsteam said...

Why do we vote for the future leader of our country based on the of the color of his skin and not the content of his character and still feel like we have the right to use MLK freely. If as a community we want to stand behind the ideals MLK fought for we might actually want to STAND for them (talk is cheap). BTW if the white republican has friends who dismiss African American's he might want to associate with a better class of people or at the very least stop being irritated and start standing up for your fellow American (no empathy needed, take action). BTW when did saying you understand someone else's struggle start translating into doing something to improve the conditions, inequalities or struggle itself?

fightthemainstream said...

Jess you seem angry. I thought the democratic party was the party of intelligent discussion? I guess you proved them wrong. First, I don't think the Republican party endorses beating up teenage girls of killing doctors (maybe you got a flier I haven't received yet) and second, are you saying a belief in the bible or GOD is a bad thing? If yes, is it okay to believe in Allah, Buddah or Satan? Tollerance has to go both ways. Nobody does it perfectly but we shouldn't point our finger's so vigorously when we all have such large imperfections.

Anonymous said...

This is what its all about with the Obama hysteria.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI

researchbuff said...

As a black Republican, I have noticed racism on BOTH sides of the isle, just in different forms. First, I am noticing the overall assuption that whenever a handout is present, so are blacks. The majority of the people who are on welfare based programs are white. When the economy firt crashed, white men from both sides accused black folk of causing its demise instead of pointing fingers at these whites who have overextended themselves financially. So, lets remove color from the welfare quotient shall we because we end up regurgitating race based lies. Its also insulting that we pretend as if the black vote is somehow in the "back pocket" of Democrats. Lets look at reality, Republicans have not made it a point of marketing to the black community therefore their existence is irrelevant to the ignored demographic.


Second, I would like to address the continuous misapplication of MLK's "color blind" society. Dr. King did not say that it was wrong to embrace differences, or to notice them for that matter. Differences only become a problem when you believe that I am less because of a perceived difference. Race will always be a factor in the life of a person of color. This is a country that did not mean for people of color to rise beyond unpaid help. Whether we like it or not, black and white alike have been trained to notice color. By the way, the traditional America was white, unapologetic, and made sure that anyone different from themselves stayed on the bottom.

researchbuff said...

Let me comment on the failure of the education system. First of all, public schools were founded to create workers, not leaders. What is the best way to enslave a people, teach them what you want? So, it is not surprising to me that an institution founded with the intent of enslaving the "working class" (white and black alike) is failing mainstream America. Today, we see the value of educating everyone. Are we stepping to the plate with personal responsibility? The breakdown of family structure is another problem. I am a teacher. If I call home, and tell you that your son, Jimmy is disrupting the class, your response should not be, "Well, what do you want me to do about it?" That's not a Republican or Democrat, a black or white issue, that's a societal issue. No, all these families are not single parent households, many are wealthy people with both parents present.

We can't focus on the three R's because we are forced to teach to an unrealistic test which contains bais based on race, class, and gender. Inner city schools are failing just like the schools in the suburbs. Media bias takes pride in only putting down black children, and we allow it. Under No Child Left Behind (which was coined by a white C student who had the funds to be who he is today -- Bush), more children have lower reading levels, poorer writing skills, and abysmal math skills. The No Child Left Behind generation will not be able to compete in a global economy. Inspite of all this, who holds the bag, the teacher. No one wants to step up and take personal responsibility this includes the parents, administrators, politicians and the community as a whole. Yes, have you ever heard the saying, you get what you pay for? Funds were cut from education by the C student known as Bush, and our children in all schools are reading from books that are well below their grade levels. Do not be deceived just because your child's school is NCLB compliant. Have you ever looked up the definitions of what it really means to be NCLB compliant. It means possibly possessing basic skills in reading, math and science. I only went on rant because this was mentioned. This is not a Democrat or Republican issue with the failure of education, it is a societal issue. I urge all a parents to go to their state education website and read the definitions of NCLB.

Anonymous said...

I ran across this blog looking up info on Michael Steele.
I really like this guy.
Who on here likes politicians? Not me.
I am just an American- who raises my kids to work hard, stay focused, and be true to yourself and you can achieve anything.

I truly believe that the Dems use the black community to secure votes.
They don't respect the black community- they want to keep some of them in poverty, to secure votes.

If you would step outside the box, and listen to the things they say (both sides)you wil see it-loud and clear.

Not all repubs are bible freaks. I agree with repubs on free market, lower taxes, smaller govt.
THat is about it. I just want the government out of my life as much as possible.
Can anyone disagree with that?

Anonymous said...

I ran across this blog looking up info on Michael Steele.
I really like this guy.
Who on here likes politicians? Not me.
I am just an American- who raises my kids to work hard, stay focused, and be true to yourself and you can achieve anything.

I truly believe that the Dems use the black community to secure votes.
They don't respect the black community- they want to keep some of them in poverty, to secure votes.

If you would step outside the box, and listen to the things they say (both sides)you wil see it-loud and clear.

Not all repubs are bible freaks. I agree with repubs on free market, lower taxes, smaller govt.
THat is about it. I just want the government out of my life as much as possible.
Can anyone disagree with that?

Anonymous said...

Here is a 124 year side by side comparison between the platforms of the Republican and Democrat parties. This is a real eye opener and worth reading.
Party Platforms
Here's an excerpt from the commentary of the first Republican platform in 1856.
† This was the first Republican platform, and
it contained only nine planks; however, six of
the nine set forth bold declarations of equality
and civil rights for African-Americans, based
on the principles enshrined in the Declaration
of Independence. This emphasis on racial justice
was the primary reason that the Republican
Party was formed.

Anonymous said...

So many in America don't know history. LBJ in 1964 had all he could do to garnish enough votes from the Democrats to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Democrats were always the segregationist party, i.e George Wallace, Robert Byrd, a couple I am sure you all know.

I agree with the fact that Democrats want to keep African Americans "down and impoverished" to some degree. Without that, they would lose their vote and what would Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton do then!

Anonymous said...

The Republican's are the ones who don't care about blacks in this country? Who freed the slaves? Lincoln, a Republican. Who started the NAACP? Oh yea, that would also be the Republican's. The party who really doesn't care is the the one that perpetuates the cycle of poverty amongst the black community. The ones that keep feeding the hands that are out and continues to create a dependancy on the government. Instead of doing the prudent thing and making the community responsible for it's own actions and giving it a chance to not only survice but thrive! Capitalism is what has always drivin this country and it doesn't matter what color your skin is (racists hate Mexicans and Asians and Indians too) but it is up to the individual to make things happen for themselve, not the government. If that is what you want, then do the rest of us a favor and move to a socialist country (no shortage of those in this day in age). Get your facts straight too before you write an article. Michael Steele opposes the death penalty and also is pro stem cell research as long as the embryo is not killed. But thanks for putting your own spin on things, just like the Democratic national media.

Susan said...

The democratic party does not care about blacks or other minorities. They pretend to care to get their votes. The democrats will not be able to keep the campaign promises they have made to these groups. Watch politics and your pocketbooks closely for the next four years. Then ask yourself if the democratic party really cares about you!

Anonymous said...

I find it just so amusing that whenever people want to talk about what the Republicans have done for us, they bring up Lincoln. If that's the most recent major event you can come up with, then we're in trouble. But, if we are going to discuss Lincoln, shall we discuss the fact that he freed slaves in only the states that seperated from the Union. So basically, he freed slaves in states that he had no authority over at the time. In simple terms, it was a b.s. political move. He was smart though.

onegentlemanofleisure said...

hmmm so Im guessing there are no libertarians here?? Onegentlemanofleisure.wordpress.com

Anonymous said...

Michael Steele is awesome! He is much more for the black man's ability to rise in economic stature than the liberal white democratic man is..they just want you to think they are helping. The republicans don't want to hold you down! We should run Michael Steele for the US Congress. He would be much better for the black man than Steny Hoyer! He just thinks he is in for life. STEELE FOR CONGRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

This is a very good blog, and I'm glad I found it. I started out looking for a way to contact Michael Steele, because of some things a caller said on the radio this morning. I'm a white Republican, but would vote happily and often for a conservative black. Color is a complete non-issue to me; and I'm from a conservative part of Texas, not a large urban area. I do believe in the Constitution, and that includes the 14th Amendment; slavery did not result from the constitution, it was an anomaly that unfortunately survived the constitutiional convention, and thankfully, is now history. Anyway, back to the point: I cannot ever imagine anyone telling me or anyone else they would never vote for a person, because he or she is black. Anyone who even thought that way would be ashamed to admit it, but I don't know of anyone who would think that way. Except that it does seem there a number of blacks who would never vote for a white person, but hopefully that too is an anomaly that will fade away; but I hope it fades quickly, so like-minded people can all get on the same team, regardless of color.

The second thing I wanted to say is that a lot of white Republicans (not all by any means) are committed Christians, and racism would be completely contrary to their belief system. I do not think a true Christian can be a racist, although I do understand that the "church institutional" can often reflect human society more than it does Christian values, and clearly the church in the twentieth century was cowed into submission by both the Nazis and the Communists; but the Good Book cannot possibly be interpreted as condoning rascism, of any sort, or to any degree. Now the great enemy of the church in our age is humanism, and its close brother, Darwinian evolution. Evolution is a lie, that is being crammed down our throats, by liberal, white theologians, liberal, white educators and teachers' unions, and liberal, white athiests and agnostics. We really need some help here, from our black brothers who recognize evolution for the half-baked lie it is.

Anyway, great blog, very mind-expanding.

Ed

Anonymous said...

Mr Steele being a republican should be seen as a positive thing no matter what party one belongs to. The expectation is for him to be democrat because he is African American is inredulous. He has the right to disaree without being seen as a traitor. For one he crushes stereotypes of all blacks being democrats and quite frankly demolishes the notion that all blacks are the same. I am more interested in his voting record.

F. said...

I find it interesting in reading most of the commentary here, that there is a general consensus of a static quality of the Two Parties - Democrats and Republicans respectively. I cannot dispute the historic record of each - there have been profound successes and failures in each - but the notion that the Republican Party of Lincoln's time is in any way practically and ideologically the same as we see today is patently false. The same goes for the Democratic Party. Both have evolved over time (for example, during Andrew Jackson's era, we saw the beginning of the Democratic Party after it was shortened from "The Democratic-Republican Party.") In other words, the respective parties are the same as earlier incarnations in name only. We have seen each party evolve into what they are today and this phenomenon will continue. Any attempts to usurp the glory days of old are met with a skeptical mind: Lincoln was a brilliant mind and leader, but he in no way could or should be tethered to events that led to a Nixon or GW Bush, anymore than Robert Byrd's shameful early days can be linked to the success of our president, Barack Obama. Each era has either it's stars or scoundrels that define them: the Parties are profoundly changed by personality and social changes. In my view, it is an unfortunate syndrome that the American Publick defines themselves (mostly) within the confines of two parties, when the interests and concerns of our nation are far more diverse than this. I suppose it boils down to the reality it is easier to consider things in an "either/or" paradigm, but again, this severely limits the dialog while corraling the less critically minded into one platform or the other. It also leads to the very polarity we see today; with few able to step outside their own rigid ideology to continue a healthy dialog.